Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPergola, Philippe
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-29T07:14:13Z
dc.date.available2025-11-29T07:14:13Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.submitted2024-12-20T12:39:17Z
dc.identifierONIX_20241220_9791221503760_297
dc.identifier2704-5870
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96502
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/206733
dc.description.abstractThis reflection, which I dedicate to my friend Guido Vannini, deals with themes at the heart of his scientific way, his method and our relations and exchanges over the past decades. Christian archaeology is by far the veteran of “post-Roman” archaeologies. A discipline born in 16th century papal Rome, it was originally strongly marked by the seal of an apologetic Catholicism, in the hottest moments of the Counter-Reformation. During the second half of the 19th century it gradually emerged from this ideological confinement. During the 20th century it became internationalized and broadened the scope of its interests. The real turning point came in the 1970s, when medieval archaeology was gaining ground. The 1980s were the years in which the centuries long considered obscure (7th-8th centuries in particular) were the object of all the attention of Christian, Classical and Medieval Archaeologies, each initially claiming a sort of monopoly, according to different ideological parameters (among those who “believe in heaven and those who do not”... ), in a “je t’aime, moi non plus”, made up of angry looks, deaf dialogues, then today’s finally constructive exchanges and debates, and new balances arise from these initial conflicts and stimulating debates.
dc.languageFrench
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStrumenti per la didattica e la ricerca
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NK Archaeology
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NK Archaeology::NKD Archaeology by period / region
dc.subject.otherLate Antique and Early Medieval Mediterranean Islands and Frontiers Public archaeology Christian topography Rural settlements
dc.titleChapter Iles, frontières et archéologies
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0376-0.35
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9791221503760
oapen.pages12
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber225
dc.abstractotherlanguageThis reflection, which I dedicate to my friend Guido Vannini, deals with themes at the heart of his scientific way, his method and our relations and exchanges over the past decades. Christian archaeology is by far the veteran of “post-Roman” archaeologies. A discipline born in 16th century papal Rome, it was originally strongly marked by the seal of an apologetic Catholicism, in the hottest moments of the Counter-Reformation. During the second half of the 19th century it gradually emerged from this ideological confinement. During the 20th century it became internationalized and broadened the scope of its interests. The real turning point came in the 1970s, when medieval archaeology was gaining ground. The 1980s were the years in which the centuries long considered obscure (7th-8th centuries in particular) were the object of all the attention of Christian, Classical and Medieval Archaeologies, each initially claiming a sort of monopoly, according to different ideological parameters (among those who “believe in heaven and those who do not”... ), in a “je t’aime, moi non plus”, made up of angry looks, deaf dialogues, then today’s finally constructive exchanges and debates, and new balances arise from these initial conflicts and stimulating debates.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access