Auf verlorenem Posten?
Die Praxis der Betriebsräte in den Aufsichtsräten in der Weimarer Republik
| dc.contributor.author | Milert, Werner | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-01T10:46:38Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-12-01T10:46:38Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-08-05T14:18:56Z | |
| dc.identifier | ONIX_20250805T161025_9783412531782_28 | |
| dc.identifier | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/105020 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/207872 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The "Law on the Appointment of Works Council Members to the Supervisory Board" of February 15, 1922, marked the birth of corporate co-determination in Germany. For the first time, the institutional appointment of a maximum of two employee representatives to corporate supervisory bodies was legally established. In practice, however, this first legal enactment of corporate co-determination in the Weimar Republic met with fierce resistance in many companies. Heavy industry, in particular, remained unwilling to cooperate with its interest groups; works councils were excluded from important information and decisions on supervisory boards and relegated to second-class supervisory board members. In contrast, employers in the "new" industries, particularly the chemical and electrical engineering sectors, accommodated the new legal provisions established by the Weimar Republic. | |
| dc.language | German | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Sozialgeschichte in Bewegung | |
| dc.rights | open access | |
| dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHT History: specific events and topics::NHTB Social and cultural history | |
| dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::1 Place qualifiers::1D Europe::1DF Central Europe::1DFG Germany | |
| dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::K Economics, Finance, Business and Management::KN Industry and industrial studies::KNX Industrial relations, occupational health and safety | |
| dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHB Sociology::JHBL Sociology: work and labour | |
| dc.subject.other | Workers' rights | |
| dc.subject.other | employee participation | |
| dc.subject.other | heavy industry | |
| dc.subject.other | history of labor | |
| dc.subject.other | 1920s | |
| dc.title | Auf verlorenem Posten? | |
| dc.title.alternative | Die Praxis der Betriebsräte in den Aufsichtsräten in der Weimarer Republik | |
| dc.type | book | |
| oapen.identifier.doi | 10.7788/9783412531782 | |
| oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | 33fecb33-e7c4-4fc8-96b0-7ba2fccafba9 | |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9783412531782 | |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9783412531775 | |
| oapen.imprint | Böhlau | |
| oapen.pages | 323 | |
| oapen.place.publication | Köln | |
| dc.seriesnumber | 74 | |
| dc.abstractotherlanguage | The "Law on the Appointment of Works Council Members to the Supervisory Board" of February 15, 1922, marked the birth of corporate co-determination in Germany. For the first time, the institutional appointment of a maximum of two employee representatives to corporate supervisory bodies was legally established. In practice, however, this first legal enactment of corporate co-determination in the Weimar Republic met with fierce resistance in many companies. Heavy industry, in particular, remained unwilling to cooperate with its interest groups; works councils were excluded from important information and decisions on supervisory boards and relegated to second-class supervisory board members. In contrast, employers in the "new" industries, particularly the chemical and electrical engineering sectors, accommodated the new legal provisions established by the Weimar Republic. |
Fichier(s) constituant ce document
| Fichiers | Taille | Format | Vue |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document. |
|||

