Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorFALSONE, MAURIZIO
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-01T14:41:27Z
dc.date.available2025-12-01T14:41:27Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.submitted2024-12-20T12:51:26Z
dc.identifierONIX_20241220_9791221505078_565
dc.identifier2704-5919
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96773
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/207973
dc.description.abstractFirst, the author explains how the EU is leading with a certain conviction in extending anti-discrimination protections beyond the narrow confines of subordinate employment. On the other hand, it highlights how, vice versa, it is the Italian legal system that is in a more advanced position in combating discrimination for trade union reasons. We, therefore, analyse the different jurisprudential orientations of the Italian Court of Cassation and the EU Court of Justice on this point. Furthermore, it is highlighted that, in a multilevel logic, there are good reasons for the extension of anti-discrimination law, on the one hand, to protect self-employment and, on the other, to protect trade union activity. Finally, it is underlined that this extention is consistent with recent regulatory proposals aimed at protecting workers in the global context of value chains, such as the proposed EU directive on duty of care or the proposal discussed within the United Nations for one binding instrument dedicated to transnational companies and other commercial enterprises regarding respect for human rights. Both recognize fundamental trade union rights and prohibitions on discrimination in a subjectively universal manner, i.e. without distinctions between categories of workers.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi e saggi
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNH Employment and labour law: general
dc.subject.otherAnti-discrimination law
dc.subject.otherself-employment
dc.subject.otherunion freedoms
dc.subject.otherdiscrimination for union reasons
dc.titleChapter I lavoratori autonomi e i ‘nuovi’ bisogni di tutela: il ruolo essenziale del divieto di discriminazioni per motivi sindacali
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0507-8.27
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9791221505078
oapen.pages22
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber259
dc.abstractotherlanguageFirst, the author explains how the EU is leading with a certain conviction in extending anti-discrimination protections beyond the narrow confines of subordinate employment. On the other hand, it highlights how, vice versa, it is the Italian legal system that is in a more advanced position in combating discrimination for trade union reasons. We, therefore, analyse the different jurisprudential orientations of the Italian Court of Cassation and the EU Court of Justice on this point. Furthermore, it is highlighted that, in a multilevel logic, there are good reasons for the extension of anti-discrimination law, on the one hand, to protect self-employment and, on the other, to protect trade union activity. Finally, it is underlined that this extention is consistent with recent regulatory proposals aimed at protecting workers in the global context of value chains, such as the proposed EU directive on duty of care or the proposal discussed within the United Nations for one binding instrument dedicated to transnational companies and other commercial enterprises regarding respect for human rights. Both recognize fundamental trade union rights and prohibitions on discrimination in a subjectively universal manner, i.e. without distinctions between categories of workers.


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

open access
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que open access