Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchäfer, Lisa
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-01T23:20:59Z
dc.date.available2025-12-01T23:20:59Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.date.submitted2025-07-10T02:30:30Z
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/104065
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/208192
dc.description.abstractThis book is concerned with the licensing and usage of the elliptical construction topic drop in German. The term topic drop refers to the omission of the preverbal constituent in declarative verb-second sentences, for example, the omission of the subject ich (‘I’) in the sentence Bin gleich zurück (‘Am right back’). Topic drop exists in most of the Germanic verb-second languages and typically occurs in spoken language and text types such as SMS, chats, notes, etc. While much of the previous research has focused on individual specific properties of topic drop, often adopting a purely theoretical perspective, this book presents a systematic investigation of both the syntactic properties and usage conditions of topic drop based on empirical evidence from a corpus study and 12 acceptability rating studies. The first part of the book investigates the licensing of topic drop, in particular its restriction to the preverbal ‘prefield’ position. The results of four rating studies on topic drop in different prefield configurations lead to a refined prefield condition based on proposals by Rizzi (1994) and Freywald (2020) that is independent of topicality. Moreover, they inform the discussion on the most suitable syntactic analysis of topic drop, supporting a PF-deletion approach. The second part of the book presents and tests an information-theoretic account of topic drop usage that builds on the Uniform Information Density hypothesis (Levy & Jaeger 2007). In a corpus study and seven rating studies, several potential usage factors are investigated, including grammatical person and verb predictability. The results provide initial evidence suggesting that topic drop usage can be explained by general processing principles: The prefield constituent is omitted when it is redundant and realized overtly when it facilitates the processing of the following verb. This information-theoretic explanation is based on independently evidenced processing mechanisms, bundles isolated claims from the theoretical literature, and allows for a unified analysis of topic drop with other types of ellipsis and reduction.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.classificationbic Book Industry Communication::C Language::CF linguistics
dc.subject.otherLanguage Arts & Disciplines
dc.subject.otherLinguistics
dc.titleThe licensing and usage of topic drop in German
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15584708
oapen.relation.isPublishedByed03121b-b998-4b50-8d58-1d0745565558
oapen.relation.isFundedBy969f21b5-ac00-4517-9de2-44973eec6874
oapen.collectionKnowledge Unlatched (KU)
oapen.collectionKU Open Services
oapen.imprintLanguage Science Press
dc.numberef3ad124-98af-4cee-a0a2-6cd6f688ccc6
dc.relationisFundedByb818ba9d-2dd9-4fd7-a364-7f305aef7ee9


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access