Afficher la notice abrégée

Hvem skal passe på rettsstaten?

Svikten i Nav sett utenfra

dc.contributor.authorB. Johansen, Nicolay
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-10T13:39:00Z
dc.date.available2026-02-10T13:39:00Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/208611
dc.languageNorwegian
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LND Constitutional and administrative law: general
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPA Political science and theory
dc.subject.otherRule of law
dc.subject.otherDemocracy
dc.subject.otherLegal oversight
dc.subject.otherConstitutionalism
dc.subject.otherPublic power
dc.subject.otherAccountability
dc.subject.otherGovernance
dc.subject.otherLegal institutions
dc.subject.otherJustice
dc.subject.otherPolitical analysis
dc.titleHvem skal passe på rettsstaten?
dc.title.alternativeSvikten i Nav sett utenfra
dc.typebook
oapen.abstract.otherlanguageWhen it emerged that 80 people had served prison sentences on wrongful grounds, and at least 8,000 had received incorrect demands to repay benefits they had received from Nav, there was an uproar. The Director of Public Prosecutions called the EEA—or Nav—case Norway’s biggest rule-of-law scandal. The government promised to turn over every stone to find out how it could happen. A public commission of inquiry delivered sharp criticism—of Nav’s leadership at all levels, of political leadership, the courts, the press, defense lawyers, and university communities. Everyone was guilty in their own areas. No one took responsibility; the scandal never truly erupted. How can similar events be prevented in the future? To take necessary precautions, it is essential to view the case in a broader context. The miscarriages of justice are an expression of changes in society’s power relations. This book emphasizes shifts between the branches of government, where the administration has been pushed onto the defensive vis-à-vis the legislature, while the courts have assumed a spectator role. At the same time, Nav’s clientele has increasingly fallen into disrepute. The Nav case was a foreseeable event for anyone who follows democracy’s and the rule-of-law state’s institutions. But who is watching over the rule of law?
oapen.identifier.doi10.55669/oa5602
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy95ac1378-484a-4e97-93fe-8adff524dc3a
oapen.relation.isbn9788245053173
oapen.relation.isbn9788245058543
oapen.pages264
oapen.place.publicationBergen


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/