Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorAdell, Nicolas,
dc.contributor.authorBendix, Regina F.,
dc.contributor.authorBortolotto, Chiara,
dc.contributor.authorTauschek, Markus,
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-10T12:58:18Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.date.submitted2016-12-31 23:55:55
dc.date.submitted2019-01-07 13:46:35
dc.date.submitted2020-04-01T14:11:09Z
dc.identifier610380
dc.identifierOCN: 1097131765
dc.identifierhttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/32470
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/26678
dc.description.abstractCommunity and participation have become central concepts in the nomination processes surrounding heritage, intersecting time and again with questions of territory. In this volume, anthropologists and legal scholars from France, Germany, Italy and the USA take up questions arising from these intertwined concerns from diverse perspectives: How and by whom were these concepts interpreted and re-interpreted, and what effects did they bring forth in their implementation? What impact was wielded by these terms, and what kinds of discursive formations did they bring forth? How do actors from local to national levels interpret these new components of the heritage regime, and how do actors within heritage-granting national and international bodies work it into their cultural and political agency? What is the role of experts and expertise, and when is scholarly knowledge expertise and when is it partisan? How do bureaucratic institutions translate the imperative of participation into concrete practices? Case studies from within and without the UNESCO matrix combine with essays probing larger concerns generated by the valuation and valorization of culture.
dc.description.abstractCommunity and participation have become central concepts in the nomination processes surrounding heritage, intersecting time and again with questions of territory. In this volume, anthropologists and legal scholars from France, Germany, Italy and the USA take up questions arising from these intertwined concerns from diverse perspectives: How and by whom were these concepts interpreted and re-interpreted, and what effects did they bring forth in their implementation? What impact was wielded by these terms, and what kinds of discursive formations did they bring forth? How do actors from local to national levels interpret these new components of the heritage regime, and how do actors within heritage-granting national and international bodies work it into their cultural and political agency? What is the role of experts and expertise, and when is scholarly knowledge expertise and when is it partisan? How do bureaucratic institutions translate the imperative of participation into concrete practices? Case studies from within and without the UNESCO matrix combine with essays probing larger concerns generated by the valuation and valorization of culture.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.othercultural property
dc.subject.otherheritage
dc.subject.othercommunity
dc.subject.otherIntangible cultural heritage
dc.subject.otherUNESCO
dc.subject.otherWorld Heritage Site
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences
dc.titleBetween Imagined Communities and Communities of Practice - Participation, Territory and the Making of Heritage
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.4000/books.gup.191
oapen.relation.isPublishedByaf9011e0-03b9-4a5c-9ae6-b9da4898d1b2
oapen.relation.isbn9783863952051
dc.abstractotherlanguageCommunity and participation have become central concepts in the nomination processes surrounding heritage, intersecting time and again with questions of territory. In this volume, anthropologists and legal scholars from France, Germany, Italy and the USA take up questions arising from these intertwined concerns from diverse perspectives: How and by whom were these concepts interpreted and re-interpreted, and what effects did they bring forth in their implementation? What impact was wielded by these terms, and what kinds of discursive formations did they bring forth? How do actors from local to national levels interpret these new components of the heritage regime, and how do actors within heritage-granting national and international bodies work it into their cultural and political agency? What is the role of experts and expertise, and when is scholarly knowledge expertise and when is it partisan? How do bureaucratic institutions translate the imperative of participation into concrete practices? Case studies from within and without the UNESCO matrix combine with essays probing larger concerns generated by the valuation and valorization of culture.


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

open access
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que open access