Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSendra, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorFitzpatrick, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-10T14:13:15Z
dc.date.available2021-02-10T14:13:15Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.submitted2020-05-05T08:57:11Z
dc.identifierhttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/37583
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/34008
dc.description.abstractThrough seven London case studies of communities opposing social housing demolition and/or proposing community-led plans, Community-Led Regeneration offers a toolkit of planning mechanisms and other strategies that residents and planners working with communities can use to resist demolition and propose community-led schemes. The case studies are Walterton and Elgins Community Homes, West Ken and Gibbs Green Community Homes, Cressingham Gardens Community, Greater Carpenters Neighbourhood Forum, Focus E15, People’s Empowerment Alliance for Custom House (PEACH), and Alexandra and Ainsworth Estates. Together, these case studies represent a broad overview of groups that formed as a reaction to proposed demolitions of residents' housing, and groups that formed as a way to manage residents' homes and public space better.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherhousing
dc.subject.othercommunity
dc.subject.otherregeneration
dc.subject.otherLondon
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JB Society and culture: general::JBF Social and ethical issues::JBFD Housing and homelessness
dc.titleCommunity-Led Regeneration
dc.title.alternativeA Toolkit for Residents and Planners
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.14324/111.9781787356061
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy29b9f0a3-1b0d-4bdd-99d7-b4d3432d7fcc
oapen.pages184
oapen.place.publicationLondon


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access