Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSeries, Lucy
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-06T03:01:45Z
dc.date.available2021-03-06T03:01:45Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.submitted2021-03-03T13:01:35Z
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/47027
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/63885
dc.description.abstractIn 2014 the UK Supreme Court was asked to rule on whether three people with intellectual disabilities were deprived of their liberty. Each of these people were living in 'post-carceral' care settings in the community: a small care home, supported living and in foster care. The Supreme Court ruled that they were, and the resultant 'acid test' of deprivation of liberty under UK law means that over 300,000 people living in the community are considered to be detained and requiring legal safeguards. This This chapter analyses the ruling in its historical context and in light of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. It suggests future avenues for addressing some of the judgment's more paradoxical and troubling consequences.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherpersons with disabilities
dc.subject.othercommunity
dc.subject.otherUnited Kingdom
dc.subject.otherlaw
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::L Law
dc.titleChapter 13 Making Sense of Cheshire West
dc.typechapter
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy498ac3ec-ef21-45dd-8d7c-39caddde6f4c
oapen.relation.isPartOfBookThe Legacies of Institutionalisation
oapen.relation.isPartOfBooke792c345-96ff-447a-ad4e-8f6e39dc2771
oapen.relation.isFundedByWellcome Trust
oapen.relation.isFundedByd859fbd3-d884-4090-a0ec-baf821c9abfd
oapen.collectionWellcome
oapen.pages12
oapen.grant.number200381/Z/15/Z
dc.relationisFundedByd859fbd3-d884-4090-a0ec-baf821c9abfd


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access