Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.editorHutchison, Katrina
dc.contributor.editorMackenzie, Catriona
dc.contributor.editorOshana, Marina
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-01T02:01:35Z
dc.date.available2021-06-01T02:01:35Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2021-05-31T11:40:33Z
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48871
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/70122
dc.description.abstractPhilosophical theorizing about moral responsibility has recently taken a “social” turn, marking a shift in focus from traditional metaphysical concerns about free will and determinism. Yet despite this social turn, the implications of structural injustice and inequalities of power for theorizing about moral responsibility remain surprisingly neglected in philosophical literature. Recent theories have attended to the interpersonal dynamics at the heart of moral responsibility practices, and the role of the moral environment in scaffolding agential capacities. However, they assume an overly idealized conception of agency and of our moral responsibility practices as reciprocal exchanges between equally empowered and situated agents. The essays in this volume systematically challenge this assumption. Leading theorists of moral responsibility, including Michael McKenna, Marina Oshana, and Manuel Vargas, consider the implications of oppression and structural inequality for their respective theories. Neil Levy urges the need to refocus our analyses of the epistemic and control conditions for moral responsibility from individual to socially extended agents. Leading theorists of relational autonomy, including Catriona Mackenzie, Natalie Stoljar, and Andrea Westlund develop new insights into the topic of moral responsibility. Other contributors bring debates about moral responsibility into dialogue with recent work in feminist philosophy, and topics such as epistemic injustice, implicit bias and blame. Collectively, the essays in this volume reorient philosophical debates about moral responsibility in important new directions.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.classificationbic Book Industry Communication::H Humanities::HP Philosophy
dc.subject.othermoral responsibility, moral agency, oppression, structural inequality, power, feminist philosophy, relational autonomy, epistemic injustice, implicit bias, blame
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy
dc.titleSocial Dimensions of Moral Responsibility
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.1093/oso/9780190609610.001.0001
oapen.relation.isPublishedBydb4e319f-ca9f-449a-bcf2-37d7c6f885b1
oapen.relation.hasChapterChapter 7 Socializing Responsibility
oapen.relation.isbn9780190609610
oapen.place.publicationOxford


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Chapters in this book

  • Levy, Neil (2018)
    There is a near universal consensus that the bearers of moral responsibility are the individuals we identify with proper names. I suggest that if we take the exercise of agency as a guide to the identification of agents, ...