Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.editorGuatelli, Fulvio
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-02T04:03:30Z
dc.date.available2022-06-02T04:03:30Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.date.submitted2022-05-31T10:12:40Z
dc.identifierONIX_20220531_8884532655_50
dc.identifier2704-5919
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/54767
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/82079
dc.description.abstractLet's try to imagine a world where scientific illiteracy is the exception rather than the rule. That is a world of subjects who are, in the vast majority, informed and aware of the main ongoing scientific debates, and who are capable of critically and independently thinking about them. A world in which everyone could dispose of the resources to develop a thoughtful opinion on cloning techniques, genetically modified organisms, new anti-cancer therapies or even on the origin of life on Earth and the final destiny of the universe. If this world were possible, what would it look like? The scepticism about the feasibility of such a scenario is justified, however it is equally undeniable that during the twentieth century there have been such profound transformations in the relationship between science and public opinion as to make the question at least legitimate and worthy of an answer.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi e saggi
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherScienza
dc.subject.otherBiotecnologie
dc.subject.otherSocietà
dc.titleScienza e opinione pubblica
dc.title.alternativeUna relazione da ridefinire
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/8884532663
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn8884532655
oapen.relation.isbn8884532663
oapen.relation.isbn9788892739000
oapen.pages233
oapen.place.publicationFirenze
dc.seriesnumber22
dc.abstractotherlanguageLet's try to imagine a world where scientific illiteracy is the exception rather than the rule. That is a world of subjects who are, in the vast majority, informed and aware of the main ongoing scientific debates, and who are capable of critically and independently thinking about them. A world in which everyone could dispose of the resources to develop a thoughtful opinion on cloning techniques, genetically modified organisms, new anti-cancer therapies or even on the origin of life on Earth and the final destiny of the universe. If this world were possible, what would it look like? The scepticism about the feasibility of such a scenario is justified, however it is equally undeniable that during the twentieth century there have been such profound transformations in the relationship between science and public opinion as to make the question at least legitimate and worthy of an answer.


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

open access
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que open access