Show simple item record

Chapter Il dibattito su “prerinascimento est-europeo” e “rinascita slava ortodossa” alla luce delle recenti ricerche

dc.contributor.authorGarzaniti, Marcello
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T04:06:24Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T04:06:24Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.submitted2022-09-15T20:06:23Z
dc.identifierONIX_20220915_9788864539102_47
dc.identifier2612-7679
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/58251
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/92269
dc.description.abstractSpeaking at the IV International Congress of Slavists in Moscow (1958) on the Second South Slavic influence in Rus’, Dmitrij Lichačëv presented his ideas on an “Eastern European Pre-Renaissance”. Lichačëv’s thesis received some criticism from the young Riccardo Picchio, who was then developing the idea of an “Orthodox Slavic revival (rinascita)”. This article revisit the debate between these two important scholars, taking into account both subsequent developments in the research of each and more recent studies on the topic.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBiblioteca di Studi Slavistici
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherSecond South Slavic influence
dc.subject.otherDmitrij Lichačëv
dc.subject.otherEastern European Pre-Renaissance
dc.subject.otherRiccardo Picchio
dc.subject.otherOrthodox Slavic revival
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHB Sociology
dc.titleChapter Il dibattito su “prerinascimento est-europeo” e “rinascita slava ortodossa” alla luce delle recenti ricerche
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/978-88-6453-910-2.09
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9788864539102
oapen.pages10
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber43
dc.abstractotherlanguageSpeaking at the IV International Congress of Slavists in Moscow (1958) on the Second South Slavic influence in Rus’, Dmitrij Lichačëv presented his ideas on an “Eastern European Pre-Renaissance”. Lichačëv’s thesis received some criticism from the young Riccardo Picchio, who was then developing the idea of an “Orthodox Slavic revival (rinascita)”. This article revisit the debate between these two important scholars, taking into account both subsequent developments in the research of each and more recent studies on the topic.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access