Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorSTEILA, Daniela
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T04:22:20Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T04:22:20Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.submitted2022-09-15T20:06:19Z
dc.identifierONIX_20220915_9788864539102_45
dc.identifier2612-7679
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/58249
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/92449
dc.description.abstractEmpirio-criticism had a huge impact in Russia, where the works of Ernst Mach and Richard Avenarius works were avidly translated and discussed, while the question of whether or not their ideas could be combined with Marxism provoked many disputes within the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party or RSDRP (Rossijskaja social-demokratičeskaja rabočaja partija). Anatolij Lunačarskij, who attended Avenarius’s classes and seminars in Zurich, particularly appreciated the opportunity to blend critical evaluation, emotion, and objective knowledge. In this period prior to the Revolution, Lunačarskij developed a sort of ‘religious’ Marxism, full of hope and enthusiasm for a final human conquest of nature, views that he continued to hold into Soviet times.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBiblioteca di Studi Slavistici
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherempirio-criticism
dc.subject.otherMarxism
dc.subject.otheremotions
dc.subject.otherreligious thought
dc.subject.otherAnatolij Lunačarskij
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHB Sociology
dc.titleChapter Il ‘machismo’ russo: il caso di A.V. Lunačarskij
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/978-88-6453-910-2.36
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9788864539102
oapen.pages9
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber43
dc.abstractotherlanguageEmpirio-criticism had a huge impact in Russia, where the works of Ernst Mach and Richard Avenarius works were avidly translated and discussed, while the question of whether or not their ideas could be combined with Marxism provoked many disputes within the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party or RSDRP (Rossijskaja social-demokratičeskaja rabočaja partija). Anatolij Lunačarskij, who attended Avenarius’s classes and seminars in Zurich, particularly appreciated the opportunity to blend critical evaluation, emotion, and objective knowledge. In this period prior to the Revolution, Lunačarskij developed a sort of ‘religious’ Marxism, full of hope and enthusiasm for a final human conquest of nature, views that he continued to hold into Soviet times.


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

open access
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que open access