Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorRovere, Valentina
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-02T00:24:51Z
dc.date.available2025-12-02T00:24:51Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.submitted2025-08-01T15:41:51Z
dc.identifierONIX_20250801T173835_9791221506020_9
dc.identifier2975-0229
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/104559
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/208212
dc.description.abstractConceived from a shared scholarly and philological perspective, Boccaccio’s Genealogie deorum gentilium and De montibus exhibit thematic overlap, as they often discuss the same geographical and mythological locations. This paper explores how Boccaccio engages with classical sources when dealing with such instances, particularly in relation to the three springs named “Arethusa” and the associated myths. While both texts broadly concur with respect to classical sources, they also disclose notable differences and distinctive features in their respective approaches.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi di letterature moderne e comparate
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherBoccaccio
dc.subject.otherGenealogie deorum gentilium
dc.subject.otherDe montibus
dc.subject.otherclassical sources
dc.subject.otherArethusa
dc.titleChapter La natura delle fonti in Giovanni Boccaccio: i luoghi del mito tra Genealogie e De montibus
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0602-0.12
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9791221506020
oapen.imprintFirenze University Press, USiena Press
oapen.pages12
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber8
dc.abstractotherlanguageConceived from a shared scholarly and philological perspective, Boccaccio’s Genealogie deorum gentilium and De montibus exhibit thematic overlap, as they often discuss the same geographical and mythological locations. This paper explores how Boccaccio engages with classical sources when dealing with such instances, particularly in relation to the three springs named “Arethusa” and the associated myths. While both texts broadly concur with respect to classical sources, they also disclose notable differences and distinctive features in their respective approaches.


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

open access
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que open access